ARO Home Page

Organization

Home

Abstracts

Announcements

Calendar

FAQ

Funding

JARO

Members

Midwinter Meeting

Organization

Positions

 

Association for Research in Otolaryngology

Animal Research Committee


To endorse and promote humane and ethical standards in the use of animals for research

[return to top]
  • Health Research Extension Act and Public Health Service Policy (PHS Policy)

    Under Section 495 of the Health Research Extension Act of 1985 (Public Law 99-158, November 20, 1985 ["Animals in Research”]), the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services acting through the Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) was charged with the responsibility of establishing guidelines for animals used in research. These guidelines are defined in the Public Health Service (PHS) Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, hereafter referred to as PHS Policy. PHS Policy requires each institution that receives PHS funds for research involving animals to file an approved Animal Welfare Assurance Statement with the NIH Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW), formerly known as the Office for Protection from Research Risks (OPRR). No PHS award involving the use of animals is made unless an Animal Welfare Assurance has been approved by OLAW. The Assurance statement commits the institution to compliance with USDA regulations, the ILAR Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, the "U.S. Government Principles for the Utilization and Care of Vertebrate Animals Used in Testing, Research and Training" (reprinted below) and other applicable laws and regulations. The Assurance Statement must describe in detail the institution's program for the care and use of animals (including mice and rats) and its program for assuring compliance with the PHS policy, following recommendations from the "Guide". It is the responsibility of the Institutional Official to ensure that procedures are in place to enable staff to remain cognizant of and compliant with state and local laws and regulations that may affect research programs. PHS Policy was amended August 8, 2002 (FR Vo. 67, No. 152, pgs. 51289-51290) to permit institutions with PHS Animal Welfare Assurances to submit verification of IACUC approval for competing applications subsequent to peer review but prior to award, effective September 1, 2002 (i.e., for all applications submitted for the May-June 2003 advisory council dates).

    The Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals was developed in 1962, when NIH contracted with the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) to develop what is now called the “Guide”. The “Guide” underwent its sixth revision in 1996. Its purpose is to assist scientific institutions in using and caring for laboratory animals in ways judged to be professionally appropriate. The “Guide” represents PHS policy by which grantees and contractors using live vertebrate animals in projects or activities supported by NIH (or any other PHS agency, such as the FDA and CDC) should be guided.

    PHS Policy and guidelines cover all laboratory animals, including all vertebrate animals (e.g., traditional laboratory animals such as rats and mice, farm animals, wildlife, and aquatic animals) that will be used in research, teaching, or testing. The “Guide” does not specifically address farm animals used in agricultural research or teaching, wildlife and aquatic animals studied in natural settings, or invertebrate animals used in research; however, many of the general principles in the “Guide” apply to those species and situations as well.

[return to top]
  • U.S. Government Principles for the Utilization and Care of Vertebrate Animals Used in Testing, Research, and Training

    The principles below were prepared by the U.S. Government’s Research Animal Committee. This committee, which was established in 1983, serves as a focal point for federal agencies' discussions of issues involving all animal species needed for biomedical research and testing. The committee's principal concerns are the conservation, use, care, and welfare of research animals. Its responsibilities include information exchange, program coordination, and contributions to policy development. PHS policy requires that all research and teaching that uses animals conform to the Principles listed below.

    Principles for the Utilization and Care of Vertebrate Animals Used in Testing, Research, and Training

    The development of knowledge necessary for the improvement of the health and well-being of humans as well as other animals requires in vivo experimentation with a wide variety of animals species. Whenever U.S. Government agencies develop requirements for testing, research, or training procedures involving the use of vertebrate animals, the following principles shall be considered; and whenever these agencies actually perform or sponsor such procedures, the responsible institutional official shall ensure that these principles are adhered to:

    I. The transportation, care and use of animals should be in accordance with the Animal Welfare Act (7 U.S.C. 2131 et seq.) and other applicable federal laws, guidelines, and policies.*

    II. Procedures involving animals should be designed and performed with due consideration of their relevance to human or animal health, the advancement of knowledge, or the good of society.

    III. The animals selected for a procedure should be of an appropriate species and quality and the minimum number required to obtain valid results. Methods such as mathematical models, computer simulation, and in vitro biological systems should be considered.

    IV. Proper use of animals, including the avoidance or minimization of discomfort, distress, and pain when consistent with sound scientific practices, is imperative. Unless the contrary is established, investigators should consider that procedures that cause pain or distress in human beings may cause pain or distress in other animals.

    V. Procedures with animals that may cause more than momentary or slight pain or distress should be performed with appropriate sedation, analgesia, or anesthesia. Surgical or other painful procedures should not be performed on unanesthetized animals paralyzed by chemical agents.

    VI. Animals that would otherwise suffer severe or chronic pain or distress that cannot be relieved should be painlessly killed at the end of the procedure or, if appropriate, during the procedure.

    VII. The living conditions of animals should be appropriate for their species and contribute to their health and comfort. Normally, the housing, feeding, and care of all animals used for biomedical purposes must be directed by a veterinarian or other scientist trained and experienced in the proper care, handling, and use of the species being maintained or studied. In any case, veterinary care shall be provided as indicated.

    VIII. Investigators and other personnel shall be appropriately qualified and experienced for conducting procedures on living animals. Adequate arrangements shall be made for their in-service training, including the proper and humane care and use of laboratory animals.

    IX. Where exceptions are required in relation to the provisions of these Principles, the decision should not rest with the investigators directly concerned, but should be made, with due regard to Principle II, by an appropriate review group such as an institutional animal care and use committee. Such exceptions should not be made solely for the purposes of teaching or demonstration.

    * For guidance throughout these Principles, the reader is referred to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals prepared by the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, National Academy of Sciences.

[return to top]
  • American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) Panel on Euthanasia

    The recommendations of the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) Panel on Euthanasia (2000) are considered the standards for acceptable methods of euthanasia of laboratory animals by both the USDA and the PHS. The most recent recommendations were published in the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (JAVMA) Vol. 218, No. 5, March 1, 2001, pp. 669-696.

[return to top]
  • Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) Regulations

    In 1978, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adopted the Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) regulations (CFR Title 21, Chapter 1, Part 58, Subparts A-K – Good Laboratory Practice for Nonclinical Laboratory Studies), which pertain to nonclinical laboratory studies performed in support of applications for research or marketing permits for products regulated by the FDA. The GLP regulations, as they apply to the use of animals, address such issues as construction and maintenance of facilities, quarantine and isolation, disease diagnosis and treatment, animal identification, caging and routine care, sanitation, and documentation requirements. The rules require the creation of Standard Operating Procedures for all aspects of the study including animal care and use. A Quality Assurance Unit must be established to conduct internal inspection of practices and records to insure compliance with established policies and procedures. GLP regulations were also adopted by the Environmental Protection Agency (40CFR160.90 and 40CFR792.90); these regulations require that feed, soil and water used for test systems be analyzed periodically to ensure that contaminants that might interfere with the study are documented.

[return to top]
  • Controlled Substances Act (CSA)

    Many tranquilizers, anesthetic agents, analgesics and other substances used in laboratory animals are regulated by the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), Title II of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) (Public Law 91-513, Title II, Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1242). This Act places all substances that are regulated under existing federal law into one of five schedules. This placement is based upon the substance's medicinal value, harmfulness, and potential for abuse or addiction. Schedule I is reserved for the most dangerous drugs that have no recognized medical use, while Schedule V is the classification used for the least dangerous drugs. The act also provides a mechanism for substances to be controlled, added to a schedule, decontrolled, removed from control, rescheduled, or transferred from one schedule to another. The Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) enforces the law. A DEA license is required to order and use scheduled drugs. All individuals and institutions that are registered are required to maintain complete and accurate inventories and records of all transactions involving controlled substances for review by DEA officials, as well as security for the storage of controlled substances.

    The controlled substances and their derivatives listed under the CSA can be found in the CFR Title 21, Chapter II, Part 1308 – “Schedules of Controlled Substances.”

[return to top]
[return to top]
  • Endangered Species Act (ESA), Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) and CITES

    Both domestic laws and international treaties have been implemented to promote long-term global conservation of fish and wildlife resources.

    The Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Public Law 93-205; 87 Statute 884; U.S.C. Title 16, Chapter 35) became effective on December 28, 1973, supplanting the Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969 (Public Law 91-135; 83 Statute 275). The law is intended for the conservation of ecosystems upon which endangered species and threatened species depend, to protect endangered and threatened species, and to “take such steps as may be appropriate to achieve the purposes of the treaties and conservation of wild flora and fauna worldwide”. Regulatory authority under the Endangered Species Act is vested in the secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior (USDI) and implemented by the USDI’s Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). Implementing rules and regulations are published in CFR Title 50 (Wildlife and Fisheries), Chapter 1 (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior), Subchapter B, Part 17 (Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of the Department of Commerce shares responsibility for administration of the Endangered Species Act. Specifically, the authority to list species as threatened or endangered is shared by the NMFS, which is responsible for listing most marine species, and the FWS, which administers the listing of all other plants and animals.

    Under the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), and the MMPA Amendments of 1994 (Public Law 103-238, April 30, 1994), which is designed to protect marine mammals and their habitats, the NMFS and FWS are charged with the authority to promulgate regulations authorizing scientific research which has the potential to disturb but not injure a marine mammal without a formal permit. Individuals must submit specified information to NMFS or FWS at least 60 days prior to beginning research. Also, “expedited scientific research permits will be allowed when delay could cause injury to a marine mammal or loss of unique research opportunities”. NMFS and FWS regulate the taking of marine mammals from the wild under the MMPA, while subsequent care and maintenance of captive marine mammals is regulated by the USDA/APHIS.

    CITES (the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) is an international agreement between governments which became effective July 1, 1975, and whose purpose is to ensure that international trade in specimens of wild animals and plants does not threaten their survival.

[return to top]
  • International Air Transport Association (IATA)

    In addition to the regulations promulgated by the USDA regarding the transportation of live animals, the transport of live animals by commercial airlines is regulated by the International Air Transport Association (IATA) Live Animal Regulations (LAR), adopted in consultation with the parties to the CITES, the Office International des Epizooties (OIE), and government authorities that implement the LAR for animal transportation.. The importation of primates is also regulated by the PHS (42CFR71.53) with specific guidelines for tuberculin testing (CDC) and special requirements for importing and transporting African green, cynomolgus, and rhesus monkeys (CDC).

[return to top]
  • Various Granting Agencies

    Agencies other than PHS (e.g. National Science Foundation) and many non-governmental funding agencies (e.g. American Heart Association) may impose additional requirements on animal care and use. Investigators applying for such funds should fully understand those requirements to assure that they are met.

[return to top]
[return to top]
  • A Few of the Many Organizations Concerned with Humane and Ethical Standards for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals
    • Scientists Center for Animal Welfare (SCAW)

      The Scientists Center for Animal Welfare (SCAW) is a “non-profit educational association of individuals and institutions whose mission is to promote the best practices of humane care, use, and management of animals involved in research, testing or education in laboratory, agricultural, wildlife or other settings.”

    • Applied Research Ethics National Association (ARENA)

      ARENA is a national organization for professionals concerned with issues relating to the humane care and treatment of animals “and other ethical issues pertaining to biomedical and behavioral research.”

    • Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research (PRIM&R)

      PRIM&R is a national organization “committed to the advancement of strong research programs and to the consistent application of ethical precepts in both medicine and research.”

    • American Association of Laboratory Animal Science

      AALAS is a national organization for professionals concerned with issues relating to the humane care and treatment of animals.

    • Animal Welfare Information Center

      The Animal Welfare Information Center is part of the National Agricultural Library (NAL), and was established in 1986 as mandated by amendments to the Animal Welfare Act. It is the focal point for those interested in obtaining information or publications covering many aspects of animal welfare.

[return to top]

 


Thank you for visiting the
Association for Research in Otolaryngology
ARO Office: 19 Mantua Rd. Mt. Royal, NJ 08061 USA
headquarters@aro.org